General

6 Points, Zero Evidence

Editor
Written by Editor

From www.consider.info site.

Judge Lori K. Smith, King County Prosecutors
Enumclaw Police

Perversion of Law Came Down To 6 Points

Zero Evidence

Does anyone think that there needs to be evidence in a trial?” King County Prosecutors and Enumclaw Police

Enumclaw Police and King County Prosecutors of Washington State produced zero evidence that a crime had taken place.  This is why, during jury selection prosecutor and judge asked the jury pool: “Does anyone think that there needs to be evidence in a trial?”

Once Judge Lori K. Smith and the Prosecutors had gotten rid of those who understand that all trials need evidence, they could pervert the word evidence to a gullible jury and public.

6 Points

In closing arguments to the jury, King County Prosecutors changed the False Accuser’s testimony that she “screamed at the top of her lungs” night after night, to, “She, wanted to scream.” Not one time did the False Accuser ever state she “wanted” to scream. The False Accuser always testified that she always screamed!
King County Prosecutors so manipulated testimony that King County Prosecutor Jason Simmons told the jury “…she wanted to believe she screamed.” The False Accuser testified she did scream, but King County Prosecutors knew this made the crime impossible …so they lied for the False Accuser. Extraordinary deception this psycho-bable in King County Court that prosecutors can contradict their witness to embellish lie after lie further. In short, such tricks are called committing fraud.

Judge Lori K. Smith‘s trial came down to several basic factual points that were kept in the darkness at every turn by King County Courts.

All of these 6 points and more are examined in high detail on hardtruth.us. (hardtruth.us is being slowly moved to www.consider.info)

1. Physics made crime impossible.

The layout of the house made the crime impossible!

Prosecutors offered zero contrary evidence of any kind. The whole idea of a prosecutor presenting evidence for a crime was inverted, with the prosecution presenting no evidence and the defense highly censored from producing an abundance of hate crime and factual evidence. This is also why Enumclaw Police never bothered to go to the house and examine the physical layout of the home! Although I have every reason to believe Enumclaw Police did examine the house and, having once discovered that the home’s layout made the crime impossible, covered up that fact. Indeed, such knowledge would have shifted the focus from a scripted-out accusation to a conspired hate crime. But for the sake of facts at hand, let us assume Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall, refusing to investigate according to the facts did not examine the house layout.

Think of it!

The Enumclaw Police in so very small of a town would not go over to the house to see if the accusation was even possible.
King County Courts are so servant to prosecutors that King County Prosecutors knew they would be rewarded for supporting corruption, lying and ignoring the judge’s commands.

2. The time frame made the crime impossible.

The time frame alleged made the crime impossible. Zero evidence for alleged time frame testified to under oath was presented by King County Prosecutors. (Prosecutors offered zero contrary evidence or any evidence of any kind.)

3. The medical conditions made the crime impossible.

The physical handicap of the accused made the crime impossible. (Prosecutors offered zero evidence of any kind on this fact.)

4. Enumclaw Police conspiring was protected.

The conspiracy between Enumclaw Police Grant McCall and Athena Dean Holtz made the charges a lie.
Prosecutors, Enumclaw Police, and Judges covered up the evidence of this conspiracy hate-crime.
One example: Enumclaw Policeman Grant McCall sat alone with the False Accuser, scripting out the accusation.
Shutting on and off the recorder as Grant McCall became frustrated that the Athena Dean Holtz / Grant McCall’s worked out beforehand accusations were not being mocked back by the False Accuser.
This corruption was fully protected by King County Courts, King County Prosecutors, Enumclaw Police and notably Judge Lori K. Smith.

5. Tabloid prosecution upended the rule of law.

Law is that prosecutors are to provide evidence of a crime and the accused is to defend himself against those facts. King County Prosecutors had no facts, no evidence and knew they had zero evidence.

Thus King County Prosecutors employed trial by obscene objections and a tabloid prosecution.
This upending of the rule of law was whitewashed by Judge Lori K. Smith, King County Prosecutors and Enumclaw Police.
The Prosecution presented zero evidence, had zero evidence, so resorted to embracing liars that would create tabloid slander to enrage a jury. The complete opposite to the whole concept of justice laws and due process.
Indeed, the misconduct of Enumclaw Police Grant McCall was kept from the jury.
Fact is anything that would have revealed the lack of credibility with the Enumclaw Police, the False Accuser and the State of Washington was illegally blocked.
Every call for an investigation on any level was thoroughly squashed.
Indeed, not one person testifying presented any evidence to back up their slander and lies.
King County Prosecutors offered not one single proof for their proxie-prosecution of Timothy Williams through Washington State vs Malcolm Fraser.
I have over 95% of the trial video recorded, the official transcript, and far more evidence than can be presented here.
Thus no wonder that the City of Enumclaw Police are encouraged to promote corruption.
Note: none of the slander, or lies, had anything to do with the charged crime thus the whole of the legal ordeal was a fundamental corruption of the concept of law.
No evidence was required because as five Federal Judges have noted, King County Prosecutors and King County Judges readily engage liars to achieve their self-interest ends.
The corruption by Prosecutors of Washington State against those holding a contrary viewpoint is rampant especially against white, Christian preachers of holiness like Timothy Williams. In the case, King County Prosecutors along with the heavy hand of King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg ram-rodded a prosecution by tabloid ordeal.


6. Prosecution lied and changed testimony.

Prosecutors readily lied and re-constructed accusations to fit their amoral goals.
Judge Lori K. Smith encouraged Prosecutor Jason Simmons to change the False Accuser’s testimony with every ruling and set-for-the-prosecution tone of the courtroom. Indeed King County Prosecutors knew they could blow-off any command given by Judge Lori K. Smith.
In closing arguments to the jury, King County Prosecutors changed the False Accuser’s testimony that she “screamed at the top of her lungs” night after night, to, “She, wanted to scream.” Not one time did the False Accuser ever state she “wanted” to scream. The False Accuser always testified that she always screamed!

King County Prosecutors so manipulated testimony that King County Prosecutor Jason Simmons told the jury “…she wanted to believe she screamed.” The False Accuser testified she did scream, but King County Prosecutors knew this made the crime impossible …so they lied for the False Accuser. Amazing deception this psycho-bable in King County Court that prosecutors can constradict their witness to further emblish lie after lie.
In short, such tricks are called committing a fraud.

  • To get around the evidence of the fact that the layout of the homemade screaming at the top of one’s lungs something everyone would have heard, King County Prosecutors easily embraced lying.

The examples of this flat-out lying concerning testimony and the use of lies to win a conviction are astoundingly often and emboldened by Judge Lori K. Smith.
All 6 of the above points thus had to be hidden by King County Prosecutors and Judge Lori K. Smith in order to achieve a guilty verdict.
Therefore every aspect of the truth was dislodged by a storm of slander, lies, and evidence hiding by King County Judge Lori K. Smith, a very King County Prosecutor in-their-pocket judge.
Police Detective Grant McCall’s corruption was protected from the light of courtroom examination, Athena Dean Holtz and Grant McCall’s conspiracy was duly protected, and finally, the defendant’s due process was destroyed so that no effective defense was possible.
The whole idea of a prosecutor presenting evidence for a crime was inverted with the prosecution presenting no evidence and the defense highly censored from producing the abundance of hate-crime factual evidence. King County Prosecutor Jason Simmons even asking potential juries that believed there had to be evidence to leave the jury pool. Naturally, at trial, King County Prosecutors changed the definition for “evidence” to twist-around tabloid prosection.
In other words, everything was done to ensure that the defense was not able to put forth a defense ~ and it worked.
And not only did it work, but the message has gone out loud and clear from King County Prosecutors and Judge Lori K. Smith ...corruption will be protected if it fits the biased narrative of King County Courts.
There is one reason, 1 top reason why impossible crimes are re-enforced by Judge Lori K. Smith.
That 1 reason is when it comes to law enforcement personnel, no corruption is too mean, too little or too much for Judge Lori K. Smith and King County Prosecutors to hide in darkness.
Since Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall despised Sound Doctrine Church, aka, Timothy Williams, McCall’s Baptist, King James only Bible, pro-create to have children doctrines were given the weight of King County Court law.
No wonder City Attorney Mike Reynolds and the Enumclaw Police can in broad daylight promote corruption.
Below is just one piece of evidence that Judge Lori K. Smith and King County Prosecutors ensured that it never saw the light of examination to protect then Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall.

About the author

Editor

Editor

First to those in Damascus, then to those in Jerusalem and in all Judea, and to the Gentiles also, I preached that they should repent and turn to God and prove their repentance by their deeds. (Acts 26:20)